Rotchford says, "Dr. Naeser showed that the degree of the TAC has demonstrated the destruction makes a clear difference in response to acupuncture." Why the Western studies misleading when China and Japan, as well as largely a paper support for the
treatment of acupuncture in thousands of cases?
Experts "First acupuncture approach is different." In the East, acupuncture is daily twice a day for maximum stimulation of the nervous system. "recommend treating various 3 times a week at least, it would be better." Secondly, the Western studies using the main points of the Yang Ming and Shao Yang standard. Chinese studies indicate that the use of scalp separately or together with a stronger contribution points. A more recent approach, Xingnao Kaiqiao (A awareness), generated by Dr. Shi Xuemen and colleagues, seems very attractive. Try PC 6 GV 26, SP 6, BL 40, HT 1 (slightly distal point generally designated), LU 5 and IG 4 each sequence to the point of tears (GV 26) and muscle shakes. A series of 3200 patients, requested a priest in 58% and 90% effective improvement extent reasonable self-sufficiency. Other points are added to pseudobulbar paralysis, where report good results in more than 300 patients. The comparison of this technique to the traditional points of acupuncture Yang and scalp, denoting excellent results in 76% to 36%. "I suggest a study as carried out by the Group Johansson, using Xingnao Kaiqiao, and the treatment of at least 5 days a week." Thirdly, we must consider the healer Qi transmission with the patient in any therapy, especially in acupuncture. I believe the intention is essential, and the intensity of the interest and empathy could create a healing much improved. With this in mind, the background and the formation of acupuncturists who participate in a study should be taken into account. "From its review of"Acupuncture for dysphagia after a stroke".
As well, people do not study of Chinese medicine acupuncture research into acupuncture, but rather their own strange version of it - who knows? where comes from. I have no idea of who is teaching them (what are they teaching?), or what books you are reading, if any. I don't be so sharply critical of the work of the people, but as a body of work, I would say the American acupuncture research has earned the distinction of being the most useless.
